ICYMI: Current Rooftop Solar Policy is "Inequitable and Worsening
Posted on October 27, 2022
Former U.S. Energy Advisor Says “… households without rooftop solar pay higher rates to meet the revenue needs for fixed costs. This is the real ‘solar tax’”
Sacramento – In a recent op-ed in the Marin Independent Journal, former senior energy advisor for the U.S. Agency for
International Development, Robert Archer, weighed in on the Net Energy Metering
(NEM) solar subsidy program, calling the policy “inequitable and worsening.”
He joins a chorus of other consumer, business,
senior, community and environmental groups, along with independent researchers
who have advocated for NEM reform to ensure non-solar customers, who are
disproportionately lower-income, aren’t paying for costs that should be paid by
customers with rooftop solar.
Below are some excerpts from
the op-ed:
- “Recent critiques of the
California Public Utility Commission’s proposed solar residential rooftop
reforms seem to generate more heat than light.”
- “Generally overlooked in the
reform debates are the economic inequity, high cost and declining benefit
of the current policy. Current rooftop solar policy is inequitable and
worsening.”
- “The crux of the problem is
that rooftop solar households don’t fully
contribute to
utility fixed costs: transmission and distribution, wildfire mitigation
and compensation, energy efficiency programs, low-income subsidies and
early technology investments, to name a few.”
- “So, households without rooftop solar pay higher
rates to meet the revenue needs for fixed costs. This is the real
‘solar tax’”.
- “Current rooftop solar owners
have had and will continue to have a good deal. According to Consumers
Checkbook, the average payback and profit for current Bay Area solar
households is six years and $28,557. Payments currently extend for 20
years and the CPUC proposes to scale it back to 16 years.”
- “California’s high electricity
rates, outmoded residential rooftop solar policy and other actions are
leading to higher and higher electricity prices. This is the wrong
direction and undermines the greater policy objective: widespread
electrification.”
- “The current rooftop solar
policy, despite its initial success, has lingered long past the time of
being equitable or efficient. When the facts change, policy needs to
change.”